Can’t find what I’m looking for, but here’s a case doctor Hollander might want to look at if she decides to sue her attorney Irving Johnson and his firm:

http://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Court_of_Appeals/opinion/2005/2005q1/02CA0617.pdf

It’s basically about whether a certificate of review is required and in this case, the CO appeals court ruled that no cert is required if an attorney lets the statute of limitations expire before filing suit or in this case, telling the client that he’s no longer representing her.

How would the court feel about attorney Johnson’s subornation of perjury and recommending to SUE to have the TRUTH removed from the internet?

Is a certificate of review required?

I sure hope not.